Five Myths About Medical Negligence

 

With the cries from all sides about “health care reform”, death panels, government takeovers, and rationing of care, now tort reform has been thrown into the mix. American Association of Justice published "Five Myths about Medical Malpractice Negligence."  I reprint it below.

It is especially interesting since the Georgia Supreme Court is currently considering whether to SB3’s $350,000 cap on non-economic damages, which passed in 2005, is constitutional.

“Tort Reform” in the medical arena will do practically nothing to lower health care costs, and certainly will not fix whatever perceived ills there are in the “broken health care system”. However, it will most definitely hurt patients injured through no fault of their own. Seemingly, the effects of legislation on real people have somehow evaporated from the discussion.

To break through all the hyperbole, lies, and distortions, the American Association for Justice today released a new report, "Five Myths About Medical Negligence." The next time a cable news pundit or your neighbor starts talking about tort law changes, chances are this manual will rebut their claims.

As the health care debate moves forward, here are the key myths and facts:

Myth #1: There are too many "frivolous" malpractice lawsuits.
Fact: There's an epidemic of medical negligence, not lawsuits. Only one in eight people injured by medical negligence ever file suit. Civil filings have declined eight percent over the last decade, and are less than one percent of the whole civil docket. A 2006 Harvard study found that 97 percent of claims were meritorious, stating, "portraits of a malpractice system that is stricken with frivolous litigation are overblown."

Myth #2: Malpractice claims drive up health care costs.
Fact: According to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, the total spent defending claims and compensating victims of medical negligence was just 0.3% of health care costs, and the Congressional Budget Office and Government Accountability Office have made similar findings.

Myth #3: Doctors are fleeing.
Fact: Then where are they going? According to the American Medical Association's own data, the number of practicing physicians in the United States has been growing steadily for decades. Not only are there more doctors, but the number of doctors is increasing faster than population growth. Despite the cries of physicians fleeing multiple states, the number of physicians increased in every state, and only four states saw growth slower than population growth; these four states all have medical malpractice caps.

Myth #4: Malpractice claims drive up doctors' premiums.
Fact: Empirical research has found that there is little correlation between malpractice payouts and malpractice premiums paid by doctors. A study of the leading medical malpractice insurance companies' financial statements by former Missouri Insurance Commissioner Jay Angoff found that these insurers artificially raised doctors' premiums and misled the public about the nature of medical negligence claims. A previous AAJ report on malpractice insurers found they had earnings higher than 99% of Fortune 500 companies.

Myth #5: Tort reform will lower insurance rates.
Fact: Tort reforms are passed under the guise that they will lower physicians' liability premiums. This does not happen. While insurers do pay out less money when damages awards are capped, they do not pass the savings along to doctors by lowering premiums. Even the most ardent tort reformers have been caught stating that tort reform will have no effect on insurance rates.

Over 98,000 people die every year from preventable medical errors. That's like two 737s crashing every day for a whole year. Instead of focusing on tort law changes that won't fix health care, let's make sure people aren't injured in the first place. Not only will that lower costs, but most importantly, will improve health care for everyone.

Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anthony-tarricone/calls-for-tort-reform-des_b_345438.html&cp

You can view AAJ President Anthony Tarricone’s article on the Huffington Post and link to the article by clicking here.

Medical Malpractice Damages Cap Before the Supreme Court

Attorneys for a woman who suffered severe facial disfigurement as a result of a botched cosmetic surgery procedure have told the Georgia Supreme Court about the unfairness and injustice of tort reform laws that cap medical malpractice damages.

In 2005, enthusiastic lawmakers cheered on by vested interests, including health care companies and insurers, passed sweeping reform laws that limited the non-economic damages that an injured patient could receive at $350,000. Non-economic damages include those for physical and mental pain and suffering and diminishment of the quality of one’s life. Since the law was passed, hundreds of patients who have suffered serious injuries from the negligence of their health care professionals, including doctors and nurses, have had their recovery options limited.

 

One of those patients, Betty Nestlehutt, visited an Atlanta cosmetic surgeon for a facelift. The results of that surgery illustrate how important it is that doctors continue to be held fully accountable to their patient’s for their negligence. Nestlehutt’s skin was left severely disfigured, and even after extensive treatment, continues to be scarred.

 

A Fulton county jury returned a verdict of $115,000 for her medical expenses and $1.15 million in non-economic damages. The facility, where the surgery was performed, appealed against the verdict. This week, the Supreme Court heard an appeal, and will decide whether placing caps on damages in medical malpractice cases is unconstitutional in Georgia.

This is definitely a case that has been closely followed by injured patients, safety advocates and Fulton County Georgia medical malpractice lawyers . For four years, we have waited and watched frustrated, as the cap severely restricted the rights of victims injured by medical negligence.  Medical malpractice lawsuits are notoriously expensive to litigate, and when damages are capped, it's makes it economically infeasible to pursue a number of meritorious claims for injured patients. The cap limits the rights of ordinary citizens in Georgia and we hope that the Supreme Court will uphold the Georgia Constitution and strike down the cap.