A Marriott franchise hotel has withdrawn its defense in a premises liability lawsuit involving a woman who was raped at gunpoint on the hotel premises, in front of her two children. The defense alleged that the victim failed to exercise due care and protect her safety, as well as the safety of her children.
In 2006, the woman was assaulted by Gary Fricker when she was in her mini van in the hotel’s parking lot. Fricker proceeded to rape her at gunpoint, and threatened to rape her kids. Fricker was found guilty, and is currently serving a 20-year sentence in jail. The woman filed a premises liability lawsuit against the Stamford Marriott Hotel and Spa in Connecticut, where the rape took place. The lawsuit alleged among other things that the hotel had failed to properly train employees, and monitor parking areas in spite of the knowledge that there had been some earlier assaults in the vicinity.
Marriott’s loyal customers were probably not prepared for the defense filed though court papers earlier this month. Lawyers for the hotel’s insurance company alleged that the woman failed to prevent the rape, and failed to exercise due care and proper use of her senses and facilities. The reaction was swift, and it was massive. Women’s groups have been rightly outraged, and many Marriott customers have voiced their decision to boycott the chain. Rape victim support groups insist that they see this all the time - a victim getting blamed for the crime.
The defense doesn’t surprise Atlanta premises liability lawyers, however. In a premises liability lawsuit, the victim has to prove that the property owner was negligent in providing safety. Premises owners and their insurers frequently go to great lengths to prove that the victim was careless, and that it was their conduct that contributed to the rape, injury or assault.
Marriot International released a statement apologizing for any distress it caused customers and guests, who were offended by the defense pled by its franchise. The decision was no doubt triggered by the prospect of lost goodwill arising from taking such a ridiculous legal position in that particular case.